• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

• 페이스북 공유
• 트위터 공유
• 

Allow us to suppose, as an illustration, that each one technique of subsistence have fallen 2/3rds in price, while the day’s wages have fallen but 1/3rd - for instance, from three to two shillings. Although the worker can now get a larger quantity of commodities with these two shillings than he formerly did with three shillings, yet his wages have decreased in proportion to the acquire of the capitalist. Are wages determined merely by this money worth? What the workers directly receive for their labour-power is a sure sum of cash. The extra rapidly the capital destined for production - the productive capital - will increase, the more affluent industry is, the more the bourgeoisie enriches itself, the better enterprise gets, so many extra staff does the capitalist need, so much the dearer does the worker promote himself. The worker perishes if capital does not keep him busy. Capital perishes if it doesn't exploit labour-power, which, in order to use, it should purchase. Finally, allow us to suppose that the money price of labour-power remained the identical, while all agricultural and manufactured commodities had fallen in worth due to the employment of new machines, of favorable seasons, etc. For the same money the workers may now buy extra commodities of all kinds.

The workers obtained the identical amount of coined silver for his or her labour-energy as before. The profit of the capitalist - the manufacturer’s as an example - has increased one shilling, which implies that for a smaller quantity of change values, which he pays to the worker, the latter must produce a larger quantity of exchange values than before. The labour-power of the wage-labourer can change itself for capital solely by increasing capital, by strengthening that very energy whose slave it's. The SAFER holds 3.1 lb (1.Four kg) of nitrogen propellant and can change an astronaut's velocity by a maximum of about 9 toes/second (three meters/second). If you are planning to remain in your home for a very long time, you can indulge your private preferences, but if there's a chance you'll be moving in a number of years, suppose twice. But neither the nominal wages - i.e., the sum of money for which the labourer sells himself to the capitalist - nor the actual wages - i.e., the quantity of commodities which he can buy for this money - exhausts the relations which are comprehended within the time period wages. Wages are determined above all by their relations to the achieve, the profit, of the capitalist.

Real wages could stay the same, they could even rise, nevertheless the relative wages could fall. Didn't their wages fall? If then we converse of a rise or fall of wages, we now have to bear in mind not only the money value of labour-energy, the nominal wages, but also the real wages. The money worth of their work remained the same, and but their wages had fallen, for in alternate for a similar quantity of silver they obtained a smaller amount of different commodities. The money worth of labour-energy, the nominal wages, price don't therefore coincide with the precise or actual wages - i.e., with the quantity of commodities which are actually given in change for the wages. Wages are that part of already current commodities with which the capitalist buys a certain quantity of productive labor-power." However the capitalist must exchange these wages out of the value for which he sells the product made by the worker; he must so change it that, as a rule, there stays to him a surplus above the price of production expended by him, that is, he must get a profit. Conversely, when economies are thriving and there's confidence in the markets, demand for these precious metals might lower, leading to a potential decline in prices.

But wages usually are not in any respect determined merely by the sum of commodities for which they could also be exchanged. A house could also be large or small; as lengthy as the neighboring houses are likewise small, it satisfies all social requirement for a residence. The Bullion Report of the House of Commons of 1810, was happy to state at its very outset, that the costs of all commodities had risen, and gold appeared to have risen in price only in common with them. The worth of gold and silver, subsequently, fell in relation to different commodities. To say that the interests of capital and the pursuits of the workers are an identical, signifies solely this: that capital and wage-labour are two sides of 1 and the identical relation. Our desires and pleasures have their origin in society; we subsequently measure them in relation to society; we don't measure them in relation to the objects which serve for his or her gratification. We have stated: "Wages aren't a share of the worker within the commodities produced by him. That is what the boasted neighborhood of pursuits between worker and capitalists amounts to. When wage-labour produces the alien wealth dominating it, the facility hostile to it, capital, there movement again to it its means of employment - i.e., its technique of subsistence, beneath the condition that it once more develop into part of capital, that is change into again the lever whereby capital is to be forced into an accelerated expansive movement.