• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

• 페이스북 공유
• 트위터 공유
• 

Allow us to suppose, as an example, that each one technique of subsistence have fallen 2/3rds in value, whereas the day’s wages have fallen however 1/3rd - for example, from three to 2 shillings. Although the worker can now get a larger amount of commodities with these two shillings than he previously did with three shillings, yet his wages have decreased in proportion to the achieve of the capitalist. Are wages determined merely by this money price? What the staff straight obtain for their labour-energy is a sure sum of money. The extra rapidly the capital destined for manufacturing - the productive capital - increases, the more affluent business is, the more the bourgeoisie enriches itself, the better enterprise will get, so many extra staff does the capitalist need, a lot the dearer does the worker promote himself. The worker perishes if capital doesn't keep him busy. Capital perishes if it doesn't exploit labour-energy, which, in order to use, it must buy. Finally, allow us to suppose that the money value of labour-energy remained the identical, whereas all agricultural and manufactured commodities had fallen in value due to the employment of latest machines, of favorable seasons, and so on. For the same money the workers could now purchase more commodities of all types.

The workers received the identical quantity of coined silver for his or her labour-power as earlier than. The profit of the capitalist - the manufacturer’s for example - has elevated one shilling, which signifies that for a smaller quantity of trade values, which he pays to the worker, the latter must produce a larger quantity of alternate values than earlier than. The labour-power of the wage-labourer can change itself for capital solely by increasing capital, by strengthening that very power whose slave it's. The SAFER holds 3.1 lb (1.Four kg) of nitrogen propellant and can change an astronaut's velocity by a most of about 9 ft/second (3 meters/second). If you're planning to remain in your house for a very long time, you may indulge your private preferences, but when there's an opportunity you'll be moving in just a few years, think twice. But neither the nominal wages - i.e., the amount of money for which the labourer sells himself to the capitalist - nor the true wages - i.e., the quantity of commodities which he should buy for this money - exhausts the relations which are comprehended in the term wages. Wages are determined above all by their relations to the acquire, the revenue, of the capitalist.

Real wages may remain the identical, they could even rise, nonetheless the relative wages could fall. Did not their wages fall? If then we speak of a rise or fall of wages, we've got to remember not only the money worth of labour-energy, the nominal wages, but also the true wages. The cash value of their work remained the same, and but their wages had fallen, for in exchange for the same quantity of silver they obtained a smaller amount of other commodities. The money price of labour-energy, price the nominal wages, do not therefore coincide with the actual or real wages - i.e., with the amount of commodities which are literally given in change for the wages. Wages are that part of already present commodities with which the capitalist buys a certain amount of productive labor-energy." However the capitalist should substitute these wages out of the worth for which he sells the product made by the worker; he must so replace it that, as a rule, there stays to him a surplus above the price of manufacturing expended by him, that is, he must get a revenue. Conversely, when economies are thriving and there may be confidence in the markets, demand for these precious metals might lower, leading to a possible decline in prices.

But wages usually are not at all decided merely by the sum of commodities for which they could also be exchanged. A home could also be giant or small; as long because the neighboring homes are likewise small, it satisfies all social requirement for a residence. The Bullion Report of the House of Commons of 1810, was pleased to state at its very outset, that the prices of all commodities had risen, and gold appeared to have risen in price solely in frequent with them. The value of gold and silver, due to this fact, fell in relation to different commodities. To say that the interests of capital and the pursuits of the staff are equivalent, signifies solely this: that capital and wage-labour are two sides of 1 and the identical relation. Our desires and pleasures have their origin in society; we therefore measure them in relation to society; we do not measure them in relation to the objects which serve for his or her gratification. We have said: "Wages should not a share of the worker within the commodities produced by him. That's what the boasted community of interests between worker and capitalists amounts to. When wage-labour produces the alien wealth dominating it, the power hostile to it, capital, there move back to it its technique of employment - i.e., its technique of subsistence, under the condition that it once more change into part of capital, that's change into again the lever whereby capital is to be compelled into an accelerated expansive motion.